google-site-verification=-CxNBF1tY1OFq-FxGj905sLa3tg462Giw6WbFn0gZDA

Read “Consider this”, page 143 (2nd) Dye, C & Garman, A., (2015). Exceptional Leadership (second ed.). Chicago, Il: HAP
What guidelines would you put in place for decision making to allow consensus while keeping the process from getting bogged down?
here is link to free pdf
Due: In order to enable a scholarly discussion, create your initial post by Day 3 (Wednesday at 11:59 pm), and reply to at least two of your classmates’ posts on two separate days, starting on the day after your initial post and ending on Day 7 (Sunday at 11:59 pm). No late posts are accepted.
Please use APA style for citations and references. Type or paste your response directly in the text box, do not attach any document files.
Please refer to the grading rubric Download grading rubric for details on how this activity will be graded, and incorporate these guidelines into your discussion post.
Initial Post
In 500 to 750 words, post your initial response to the topic. You must have at least two references in your initial posting and the weekly readings can be one of the references, the second reference must include a current article (within past two years) from a reputable journal, white paper, or other media source (Washington Post, New York Times, Kaiser Health News, Brookings Institute, etc.). List the references and post the link to the sources.
Reply Posts
In 250-300 words, respond to each other to build upon the initial discussion posts. Your replies should demonstrate synthesis of the week’s content, introduce new questions and/or present new information. List the references and post the link to any new sources. Provide one to two references and post the link to the sources. Reply to two classmates’ posts on two separate days, starting on the day after your initial post and ending on Day 7.