google-site-verification=-CxNBF1tY1OFq-FxGj905sLa3tg462Giw6WbFn0gZDA

1.What is the doctrine of double effect? What general kinds of actions does it allow and what kinds of actions does it prohibit?
2.Explain James Rachels’ “Bare Difference Argument” for the equivalence of active and passive euthanasia.
3.Explain John Harris’ proposal in “The Survival Lottery.” What is Harris trying to show with this?
4.Summarize the disagreement between Singer and Narveson. Why do they disagree and how do they reach their conclusions?
5.Recall the discussion about the moral status of animals. Do animals possess the kind of status that would make it the case that eating them is morally wrong? Explain your answer.
6.What is Foot’s argument against conceiving of moral obligation in terms of categorical imperatives?
7.How does Hill argue that there is something wrong with destroying nature?